10 Best Attack Helicopters in The World

Helicopter is the most effective source used for logistics,Wars and rescue purposes these days. From their first appearance in World War II, through the Vietnam War and to the modern day, helicopters have helped to transform the battlefield.

These are the 10 Best Attack Helicopters in the World today. Each are rated on their avionics, agility, speed & firepower capabilities. You may also like the lists of fastest helicopters and advance fighter jet.

Top 10 Best Attack Helicopters in the world.

10. Z-10 

10 Best Attack Helicopters
The Z-10 attack helicopter is expected to enter service with Chinese army in 2008-2009. The Z-10 helicopter has a standard gunship configuration with a narrow fuselage and stepped tandem cockpits. Gunner is seated at the front and the pilot is at the rear. Weapons of the Z-10 may consist of 30-mm cannon, HJ-9 anti-tank guided missiles (comparable to the TOW-2A), newly developed HJ-10 anti-tank missiles (comparable to the AGM-114 Hellfire) and TY-90 air-to-air missiles. It can also carry unoperated rocket pods.

9. MI-24 Hind

Attack Helicopters
The Mil Mi-24 is a large helicopter gunship and attack helicopter and low-capacity troop transport with room for eight passengers. The Mi-24, the first helicopter to enter service with the Russian Air Force as an assault transport and gunship. The Mi-24 is a close counterpart to the American AH-64 Apache, but unlike this and other Western assault helicopters it is also capable of transporting up to eight troops.

8. AH-2 Rooivalk

Attack Helicopters
The Denel Rooivalk is an attack helicopter manufactured by Denel of South Africa. Rooivalk is Afrikaans for “Red Kestrel”. The South African air forces operate only 12 Denel AH-2 Rooivalk attack helicopters. Although it looks like an entirely new machine, the Rooivalk is based on a degree of reverse engineering of the Aerospatiale Puma, using the same engines and main rotor.

7. AH-1W Super Cobra

USA Helicopter
The Bell AH-1 SuperCobra is a twin-engine attack helicopter based on the US Army’s AH-1 Cobra. The twin Cobra family includes the AH-1J SeaCobra, the AH-1T Improved SeaCobra, and the AH-1W SuperCobra.

6. A-129/T-129 (Italy/Turkey)

Attack Helicopters
The Agusta A129 Mangusta is an attack helicopter originally designed and produced by Agusta in Italy. It was the first attack helicopter to be designed and produced wholly in Western Europe.

The TAI/AgustaWestland T-129 ATAK is a derivative version of the A129, and its development is the responsibility of Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI), with AgustaWestland as the primary partner.

You May Also Like;
10 Best Action Shots of Military Tech.
10 5th Generation Fighter Aircraft.
10 Most Amazing Aviation Museums.
10 Strange Military Vehicles of WWII.
10 Most Powerful Machines of World War II.

5. AH-1Z Viper

AH-1Z Viper, USA Helicopter
Capable. Flexible. Multi-mission. The ultimate in attack helicopters. The Bell AH-1Z Viper is a twin-engine attack helicopter based on the AH-1W SuperCobra, that was developed for the United States Marine Corps. The AH-1Z features a four-blade, bearingless, composite main rotor system, uprated transmission, and a new target sighting system. The AH-1Z is part of the H-1 upgrade program. It is also called “Zulu Cobra” in reference to its variant letter.

4. Eurocopter Tiger

Eurocopter LE TIGRE
The Eurocopter Tiger is an attack helicopter manufactured by Eurocopter. In Germany it is known as the Tiger; in France and Spain it is called the Tigre. The Tiger is powered by two MTU Turbomeca Rolls-Royce MTR390 turboshaft engines.

3. MI-28H Havoc (Russia)

Mil Mi-28 Havoc
The Mil Mi-28 (NATO reporting name ‘Havoc’) is a Russian all-weather, day-night, military tandem, two-seat anti-armor attack helicopter. It is a dedicated attack helicopter with no intended secondary transport capability, better optimized than the Mil Mi-24 for the role. It carries a single gun in an undernose barbette, plus external loads carried on pylons beneath stub wings.

2. Kamov KA-50/KA-52

Kamov KA-50/KA-52
The Kamov Ka-50 “Black Shark” is a single-seat Russian attack helicopter with the distinctive coaxial rotor system of the Kamov design bureau. It was designed in the 1980s and adopted for service in the Russian army in 1995.

The Ka-50 was designed to be small, fast and agile to improve survivability and lethality. For minimal weight and size (thus maximum speed and agility) it was uniquely among gunships to be operated by a single pilot only. The Russian designed Ka-50 Hokum also can carry 24 ?Vikhr? missiles, four 20-round rocket pods, or a mixture. The Hokum also can carry the AA-11/R-73 Archer air-to-air missiles, which makes the Hokum a very capable threat against opposing attack helicopters. The 30mm 2A42 is also mounted on the Hokum, albeit more like a fighter?s cannon. The Hokum?s top speed is 350 kilometers per hour, and it has a combat radius of 250 kilometers.

1. AH-64D Apache Long Bow

Attack Helicopters
The Boeing AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter was known to be the preeminent and most powerful anti-armor weapon system in the Gulf War. Designed to perform its combat missions day or night and in adverse weather, the Apache was designed specifically to meet the rigid requirements of the US Army’s Advanced Attack Helicopter Plan. The Apache is equipped with state of the art electronic technology and fire control systems. The firepower is awesome. The Apache can be loaded with 16 AGM-114 Hellfire Missiles, 76 70mm folding-fin aerial rockets or a combination of both – in addition to 1,200 30mm rounds for its M230 automatic cannon.

  • EAT THIS GREEN PEACE!

    Notice that last top 3 are all Russians, cause Apache was made by Russian Sikorsky!

    • Ryan Ellis

      Sikorsky is an american company…And igor Sikorsky was an american citizen by 1928. You can’t claim someone to be Russian if that person found Russia to be so awful the emigrated and took up citizenship elsewhere.

      The fact that a bunch of Russian intellectuals fled the country and successfully created a business which they wouldn’t have been able to do in Russia should not be a source of pride for any Russian. Well, aside from those who had the good sense to leave the country that is.

      • ☢ Ruhel ☢

        Regardless of the troubles surrounding the Russian/Soviet economic system, it cannot be denied that they made some astounding technical advancements. Notably, in this case, with military aircraft.

        Agreed they sucked at manufacturing products for civilian consumption, but wasn’t that always going to be the case?

        • peace man

          Sikorsky is a pain in the ass to work on lol. I love my 60’s but damn man… bell/ boeing make things so much more simple. but yeah great things came from all over the world in the united states that’s why we are the best! We have intellectuals from all over the world!

          • Sky Bitch

            That’s the thing you can’t deal with. Every nation is unique, and here comes the special element of Russian engineers: make all the controls as hard as space shuttle so only Russians could understand it. And here is the second element of Russian engineering: American engineers test the aircraft project’s characteristics, they find out can it fly or not, they create the plane and show successful results, Russian engineers make an aircraft project, create it, show successful results and only then find out that basically this thing shouldn’t fly by the laws of physics.

        • shawshank09

          The russians have stolen every advancement they have made. The whole system is corrupt, and under obama America is becoming the same

          • Believerification .

            Yeah, there’s probably no intelligent Russians in the world. Hey, did you know Anti-freeze doesn’t taste half bad?

          • shawshank09

            Really, well I would have some but I’m on a diet. An you know what they say____________!!!!
            By the way, you ain’t got any Rooshun in ya, do’s ya?? Jest was ah asken cause you mite be drinkin that stuff for medisional porpuses, bein kold and all up thar.

      • Andrey

        his brain doesn’t magically go American because he signed citizen papers, lol
        don’t play stupid…at least i think you’re playing…

        • Daniel Woodworth

          See, that’s our advantage here in America: almost all of us are from someplace else, originally, but we’re all American. The Russians can take pride in the fact that Sikorsky was born in Russia, and we can take pride in the fact that he became an American.

          • Fred

            That’s the smartest comment on this website. Nicely said.

          • promito

            Yes it’s true

          • Anthony Papagallo

            Americans are cockroaches who eat their own young.
            If Sikorsky were alive today he wouldnt piss on your racist shithole.

          • xjen

            As a Ukrainian/American I doubt it

          • WhateverDunce

            Russians have a more homogeneous and racist culture than the United States does.

          • John

            Fuck off u racist pig!

        • CascadesWA

          Sikorsky is not a leading manufacturer in the U.S. – he is small compared to Being and Lockheed.

          Secondly, Sikorsky has been American for multiple generations already. He is as far from Russian as anyone can get.

          Russia doesn’t produce or create anything of value today. They can’t even make a good car, let alone a good airplane. Russians sole credit is to helicopters, but numerous other nations have already overtaken Russia in advancement and technology – as well as capability.

          • Austin McCuistion

            I don’t know about you, but they make some Damn fine women

          • Joseph Kool

            Not really

          • JDAMtag

            Oh, for sure, . . . once you get past the bad teeth, hairy armpits, garish cosmetics, cheap clothing and poor personal hygiene practices.

          • Joseph Kool

            Russia is a shell of it’s former self, they’ve been surpassed by the Chinese and a half dozen other countries from Europe and Asia.

          • Believerification .

            What is it called when a person sees countries as completely separate, as if the leaders of those countries don’t make plans together, so that if you see say country R do something, you always assume country C has nothing to do with it. Oh yeah, they call that stupidity.

          • zen blas

            Most of the Russian military transport aircraft are Antonov’s A UKRAINIAN state owed company manufacturing in Kyiv. The new Russian fighter the PAK-FA is mostly designed and built by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited in India

          • RedBaron9495

            Wrong it’s a joint project….the bulk of the PAK-FA including the engines are built by the Russians

      • Arestaeus

        He was a Russian immigrant, in those years tons of Russian aristocrats, scientist, wealthy investors and white army officers left for the U.S.. Each was a Russian national left, because Russian empire was defeated and each contributed to American development greatly (inventions, investment, military training).
        So yes you can say Apache invented by a Russian. Alright it’s decently not better than ka52.

        • CascadesWA

          Apache was not invented by a Russian. Sorry. It was invented by an American immigrant named Sikorsky. Also, he was not the only one involved.

          Also, Sikorsky was half Polish – as you can partly tell by his name. He was already a U.S. citizen by 1928, having nothing else to do with Russia.

        • steveng

          I doubt that the Kamov KA-50/KA-52 comes anywhere near the Apache or the AH-64D Apache Long Bow, it has not been proven as deadly as the Apache and it has not had as many kills as the Apache has. But it would be an interesting thing to compare the KA52 against the Apache Log Bow but I bet you that the Apache Long Bow would outclass the KA52 and it would come out the winner.

          • Arestaeus

            You can doubt all you want:). It’s faster more maneuverable, can fly higher more powerful and safer :). If you loose s trail in Apache your gone, ka 52 doesnt have a tail rotor and has dual ejection seats. Just because Apache was used to kill more people(which is sad) , doesn’t say much.

            Ka52 carries deadlier missiles and weaponry with focus on ground units , Apache might be better for air to air targets. However a lot weapons can be reconfigured in both helicopters depending on the mission. Apache is badass, but just a hairline shy of number 1 badass:).

          • xjen

            Which wars has the Kamov been in? NON It is completely unproven in battle and until it is its just a peace of metal driven by TOY soldiers

          • Benito Llan

            Undeniably the Ka-52 has more potential than the Apache, it’s more agile, fly higher, faster and is safer (or could easily be) because crew can eject

            But also undoubtably, Apache is better in practice just because it’s widely used and thus crew and engineers learn from experience and improve all they can.

          • Benito Llan

            Ka52 has more potential but Apache is better in the practice because, you know, you learn from experience and mistakes, and you develop things when you really need to use them and you DO use them – not that Russians need to use neither DO use their choppers every day/week/year.

            If US Americans replaced their Apaches for Ka52 and put their systems and expertise, it would undoubtably become better than the Apache.

          • RedBaron9495

            Completely wrong….much of American is over-complex as well as over-rated….not to mention the MIC always over-budgeting, thus making it expensive.

        • xjen

          Soviet immigrant he was UKRAINIAN

      • RedBaron9495

        Still Russian brains though…much like the U.S Space program & NASA benefited from Operation Paperclip and have a bunch of German Nazi scientists develop the program for them.

        • Daren Mcintosh

          The rest of the German scientists went to Russia. Remember, they split Berlin, they split the spoils of war.

      • mart r

        who gives a shit if sikorsky is a septic tank ..polack..a friend of the the fuhrer in ww2…
        or a vodka and borsch boy
        this is about 10 best attack helicopters not racial profiles you dicks

    • UWANNATOUCHMEWHERE?

      Actually, multiple companies not just Sikorsky’s worked on it. Not one man. Most of them were American.

      ‘Proposals were submitted by Bell, Boeing Vertol/Grumman team, Hughes, Lockheed, and Sikorsky. In July 1973, the U.S. Department of Defense selected finalists Bell and Hughes Aircraft’sToolco Aircraft Division (later Hughes Helicopters). This began the phase 1 of the competition.[11]” ‘

      And Sikorsky was Ukrainian, not russian.

      And in the “Boeing AH-64 Apache” article Sikorsky was only mentioned twice.

      You’re wrong, you git.

      • Arestaeus

        Ukrainian and Russian was the same at the time of Surkovskiy immigration. Ukraine never existed prior to break up of soviet union. Even now days half the Ukrainian people think of themselves as Russian.

        • Guest

          Ukrainian is not Russian. I am Ukrainian and I do not consider myself anything like a Russian. Either in culture, language or behavior.

          • Arestaeus

            Your one of those :)) Good for you like I said half, the traditional Ukraine that is same as Russia.. not “Lvov” the west. I do understand, I like Russia language better:) , also in Russian they don’t have neonazis with guns killing people, they don’t force civilians to fight a war at a gun point, they also don’t overthrow just about every president they elect or constantly fight in the Parliament.
            Almost entire Ukrainian infrastructure and nearly all of its cities and ports were build by Russia for the past 500 years. Most of Ukrainian lands were Russian(except the west part) , with Russian/Ukrainian people living there for centuries. It’s funny how can one tell the difference lol.

          • nathan

            You are correct cause Ukraine and Alaska was part of russia till some queen decided to sell Alaska to America then russians born Ukraine which is still part of russia

          • Arestaeus

            Thank you. But Alaska is a completely diffrent story.

          • xjen

            You must also live in the bulshit world of Planet Putin.

          • Benito Llan

            Russians don’t have neo nazis? what a joke, many “russian volunteers” in Ukraine are neonazis.

            Both your countries are very alike in your flaws, just Putin is more succesful, powerful and wayyyy better and bigger propaganda.

        • xjen

          Ukraine existed before Russia you moron. Look up .Kievan Rus. Ukainians think of them selves as Ukrainian. Even the Pro russian insurgents movement in the east regard them selves as Ukrainian just want to be Affiliated with Russia rather then Western Europe not be part of Russia.

        • Benito Llan

          “half” dream dream, may be in the East it’s half or a little more than half, but even there propaganda is needed to make them seem to be more.

    • Mr nob

      Actually the Apache was made by American engineers at Hughes helicopters, which was then absorbed into Boeing along with other manufacturers such as Vertol.

      • Believerification .

        Yeah, just like chimichangas are made by “Americans”.

    • John

      No, the apache was made by Hughes Aircraft…..

    • CascadesWA

      Sikorsky is as much Russian as Vladimir Putin is Mexican.

      Sikorsky is an American company, owned by Americans. Just because the name sounds Polish, the Russians will attempt to take credit. Hilarious.

    • Guest

      Yea and PRADA is also a Russian name but has nothing to do
      with the Russia (and btw, PRADA is so so so loved by the ritzy Russian
      hypocrite commo upper class set too), your analogy is the most ridiculous thing
      that I have read on the web and to compare and to give Sikorsky the credit that
      his technology is in anyway related to anything Russian is absolutely
      ridiculous and you must be either a Russian commo or you have no idea what you
      are talking about. Sikorsky’s experience and knowledge and success was firstly
      and mainly due to him being in democratic US and not under the dictatorship of
      Stalin who would have probably killed Sikorsky like he did to most Russian top
      engineers and scientists of that era.

      Most of Sikorsky’s success was due to the man being persistent
      and the man being in the right place at the right time to develop the
      helicopter as a viable aircraft first, and as it was proven later, as an
      effective evacuation aircraft which was the only thing that the helicopter was firstly
      used for in the Korean War. Sikorsky was a very big part of the development of
      the helicopter as an effective air craft and also which was only achieved in
      the last 50 years, as an effective and very deadly attacking combat unit for
      the army, marines.

      If you consider Sikorsky as Russian that is fine but only by
      name but if you consider that the AH-64D Apache Long Bow has anything to do with
      Russia or Russian technology then you are either mad or you are smoking
      something illegal and you should stop doing that right away because you will
      get caught and charged with a misdemeanour. lol

    • Skillet

      Sikorsky was born in Kiev you idiot, and Kiev as we know is Ukraine

    • Jeremy Wessel

      The Apache originated with Hughes, which was taken over by McDonnell Douglass, which was taken over by Boeing. Sikorsky was not involved.

    • xjen

      Sikorsky was Ukrainian born in Kiev (Then the USSR) never RUSSIA

    • Igor

      Igor Sikorsky was born in Ukraine (for russian knowledge ).

    • Justin McElhaney

      Sirkosky had no part in making the apache..it was made by Hughes(1975-1984),Mcdonnel(1984-1997) and Boeing(1997-present)…Sirkosky only submitted a bid contract and lost…

    • Justin McElhaney

      Besides that sirkorsky was retired by the 1960s and 1 ofhis 4 sons who were all born in tne US to aUS born mother was in control of the company at the time the apache bid went out..

    • shawshank09

      What are you a commie cheerleader? or worse a democrat

    • bill george

      lol notice how the russian’s try to take credit for a Ukrainian working in a American company. Figures seeing as how shitty their country is doing nowadays

  • coolguy

    American Engineering is by far superior to say
    the least

    • jh

      bulshit and u know that

      • ☢ Bangladeshi Ruhel ☢

        Believe it or not jh, but coolguy isn’t just whistling dixie out of his a▬|▬.

        In certain industries, the gap in the last 10 years has widened, not decreased. How long that will continue is up for debates, I agree.

      • UWANNATOUCHMEWHERE?

        Actually it is. m1 Abrams, AC130, f-35. It is the best.

        • Sky Bitch

          Well, I respect AC130 in role of a gunship, not the cargo plane.
          We can identify the “potential” best tank/plane/helicopter/Humanoid Battle Robots by tests. But the real winner can only be identified through the battle. I also think that Abrams gives it’s positions back as an MBT, comparing to Leopard or Merkava (Not comparing to the eastern vehicles), but it’s only my opinion. Still Abrams stays the best tank…as an eye-candy. It’s a good tank, but not superior, If you only fight old soviet T-72 with it, that have no chances against them.

          And I’m not Russian, so there won’t be any shitstorms.

  • muzaffa hussain

    i think russain helicopter are best

    • Ejaz Khan

      Ofcourse Almost all Russian Helicopters best in performance

    • MOAB

      russian* You also forgot to put a capital and a period at the end of your sentance. Horrible grammar you have.

      • steve

        AND YOU CANT SPELL SENTENCE.

        • ☢ Ruhel ☢

          LOL

      • Dreám Bongo

        Shouldn’t Russian/beginning of a sentence start with a capital? People who live in a glass house….

      • Believerification .

        You’re a douche. Maybe he speaks 10 languages, ever think of that?

    • UWANNATOUCHMEWHERE?

      Well, you’re a moron.

    • xjen

      YEH they were great in the two gulf wars LOL

  • ?

    and what makes apache better then tiger, mi-28 and especially ka-52? The fact it’s older?

    • UWANNATOUCHMEWHERE?

      Look at the facts. Age doesn’t matter.

      • HamdiM

        Well if we’re looking at the facts, the Apache has a very poor performance record compared to the Mi-24. It should be noted though, that neither aircraft actually performed combat operations they were DESIGNED to do. There was one mission, however, in Karbala, Iraq where 31 Apaches were damaged and one was shot down in an unsuccessful attack on A Republican Guard Armor division.

  • serj shelest

    Russian helicopter have to do number one

    • UWANNATOUCHMEWHERE?

      You can’t be #1 if you’re not the best.

    • xjen

      NO they do number two (thats a joke number 2 means having a SHIT in the UK)

  • Brian Shead

    Can’t wait until the jet/helicopter. Put some 20/30 mm on that.BLUE FERRET missle with countermeasure.

  • Ciaran

    Mil 24 should have been higher on the list in my opinion

    • USSR Grunt

      Indeed.Mi-24 is even better than shitty apache

      • Joseph Kool

        Jealous Russians lol

  • billy smith

    Newest version Apache AH-64E goes around 220 mph ,this thing is a beast.

    • Sky Bith

      >>220-230 mph
      Just as fact: Soviet Mil-24 had a world record of 228 mph. The fact it’s fatter than other helicopters doesn’t make it slower. As I remember it was only beaten by Westland Lynx in 80s for 249 mph. Feel free to fix me if I’m wrong.

      • billy smith

        Sky I saw that figure the other day about
        the Mi-24 I had no idea with the size of that dude it could go that fast the
        figure I found was 208 mph.. Soviet Union wanted a hybrid attack copter with ability
        to carry a small force. There is no comparison of this type of attack copter in
        the west. I like the idea with a copter that can do both roles carry 8 special
        force units if you need have the fire power to fight your way out of a kill box.
        This copter has seen lots of combat proved it many times to come out on the
        winning side of action. Post a link about the speed that seems to be somewhat of
        an issue. I was able to read a lot about the history of this machine what it
        can do and has done. Soviet pilots
        called the Mi-24 the “flying tank”The Mujahideen fighters called it Shaitan-Arba” (Satan’s Chariot)”.

  • Himankan

    Indian LCH (Light Combat Helicopter) is a newly made attack helicopter and is said to be next to Apache. Some also call it Indian Apache and note that this new helicopter has stealth and digital camouflage too!

    • roboze

      should it not be called the apache indian? ta daa! :p

      • Believerification .

        good one

  • 2005OEFArmy .

    In my opinion the Ka-50/52 is the most advance helicopter on the planet. It is really hard to compare it to the Apache since it’s not battle tested and it may be inferior in electronics, but as far as mechanical engineering goes – it’s tops. But I think that all aspects considered, mi-24 may be the best all around helicopter ever made(considering versatility).

  • Strelok

    We will se how is nummber one in the battlefield when world war III start until then we can just speculate.

  • USSR Grunt

    Apache is shit being compared to Mi-28 and Ka-50.Also,Ka-52 should be one of the first 3! Mi-24 must be 4th or 5th!@ stupid propaganda list brainwashing

    • steveng

      And you must be Russian too…yeah??? The KA 50/52 Mi-28 in comparison to anything American is like comparing a Rolls Royce to a Lada,

      • Joseph Kool

        Even if it’s better than the Apache Russian pilots and training can’t compete.

  • Arestaeus

    Ka52 is way better than Apachee, let’s not be biased now. Faster, more maneuverable, dealer pay load and the only helicopter in the wild to have ejection seats.

    • Believerification .

      Plus, it goes higher than any other helicopter.

  • Arestaeus

    Apache is a badass helicopter but it should have between at the most 3rd on the list.

  • steveng

    Yea and PRADA is also a Russian name but has nothing to do
    with Russia (but, isn’t PRADA so so so loved by the ritzy Russian
    hypocrite communist upper class set) lol…, Your analogy is the most ridiculous thing
    that I have ever read on the web and to compare and to give Sikorsky the credit that
    his technology is in anyway related to anything Russian is absolutely ridiculous. To make this sort of a statement you must be either a Russian or you have no idea what you are talking about. Sikorsky’s experience and knowledge and success was firstly and mainly due to him being in a democratic country like America and not under the dictatorship of murderous Stalin (which btw is the reason why Sikorsky ran away from Russia) who would have probably killed Sikorsky like he did to most of the Russian top engineers and scientists of that era.

    Most of Sikorsky’s success was due to the man being persistent and the man being in the right place at the right time to develop the helicopter as a viable aircraft first, and as it was proven later, as an effective evacuation aircraft which was the only thing that the helicopter was firstly used for in the Korean War. Sikorsky was a very big part of the development of the helicopter as an effective air craft and also which was only achieved in the last 50 years, as an effective and very deadly attacking combat unit for the army, marines. If you consider Sikorsky as Russian that is fine but only by name but if you consider that the AH-64D Apache Long Bow has anything to do with Russia or Russian technology then you are either mad or you are smoking something illegal and you should stop doing that right away because you will get caught and charged with a misdemeanour…lol

  • Vexedjman11

    I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m fucking retarded but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache” and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding.

    • Windgrave Stol Mandick

      Wow. What I just read.

  • Samir Nasri

    T-129 Attack helicopter is best.
    attack time… 🙂

  • RedBaron9495

    Total b’ullshit rating…..the Ka-52 “Alligator” is the best attack Helicopter going…for speed, manoeuvrability and armaments.

  • 4555joe

    Sorry but the Apache does Not hola a cande to the Russian Armore helicópteros
    That aré work inglés in Syria .The Apache will be blow out the sky in a minute!!!

  • Some stats for the Rooivalk, now that its been properly tested in combat… Independent source: “5,545m “out-of-ground effect” hover ceiling. The next
    best is the US Apache (3,866m), followed by the Russian Mi-28 and Ka-52
    (3,600m); the Franco-German Tiger (3,200m) and the Chinese WZ-10
    (2,000m). The Rooivalk also has the highest cruise speed, the best rate
    of climb and the best range/weapons load performance, and shares with
    the Tiger the best power to weight ratio.” – although it still does not have the 10km-range Mokopa missile developed for it.

  • Mesut

    My favorite is T-129